For serious candidates

Most current-affairs material is a feed: a long list of everything that happened, sorted by when it happened. That is a reasonable way to store news and a poor way to revise it, because the exam does not ask what happened on a Tuesday. It asks about a topic.

Meridian is built the other way round.

Six stories, not sixty

Each edition is six stories and about twenty-five minutes. The constraint is the point: a list of sixty items is a list you will not finish, and an unfinished list is a worse study aid than a short one you complete. Everything that does not earn a place is left out.

Every story arrives connected

A roll revision in 2026 makes sense next to the one that collapsed in 2004 and the Aadhaar fight of 2023. Meridian keeps that line intact. Each story sits on its threads — the flow of how it got here, and the tension of the live debate — and links to the topics it belongs to, so you revise a topic rather than re-reading a headline.

Mapped to the syllabus, not to a category

Every story is tagged to the General Studies nodes it actually answers, which is what makes coverage a real measure. You can see which parts of the syllabus your reading has touched and which it has not.

Sources you can check

Every approved story cites at least two sources, linked to the original. The drafting pipeline is told to write only what its sources support and to refuse when they are too thin, and every edition is reviewed by a person before it publishes. Where a story is wrong, the correction is appended in public.

Who this is not for

If you want exhaustive coverage of every notification and appointment, this is the wrong product — a six-story edition will always leave things out, on purpose. If you want a mentor, a test series, or answer evaluation, Meridian does none of those and does not intend to.

If you want twenty-five minutes a day that compounds, this is built for you.